­The gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable, and “All Israel will be saved, does not mean what is commonly taught.

Here are two phrases Paul said when speaking of Israel. It is some modern day Christian sects that use this phrase to defend the modern state of Israel as having importance with Gods work on earth. According to them it is God’s intention to have another Israel today with buildings a “Third Temple”, for feasts, sacrifices, with Jews Established  in the land like those of old. Somehow that God would be pleased and come to save and exonerate them when He was not okay with them back then? Of whom He said were Satan’s offspring, brood of vipers, whited seplecures full of dead man’s bones?

For their judgment God said that He would not leave one stone upon another that would not be violently cast down? That the law and it’s culture made nothing perfect but a re-enactment will?

They overlook the New Covenant now in force and believe that from the time of Christ, the re-establishment of another Jerusalem, were only a bridge between the expired old and the re-establishment of the old? As if The New Covenant established by the blood of Christ through the Eternal Spirit has a successor? Talk about preferring the old wine in old skins, then trying to call it new, or superior. Blasphemy!

Christ made it clear that there is no comingling of the old and the new, and they cannot differentiate between the two.

That which is flesh is flesh, that which is spirit is spirit, you must be born again. Flesh and blood does not inherit the Kingdom of God, but they believe the Jews do showing that none who aspire that are God’s people. They seek a third temple when Christ said “destroy my temple and I will rebuild it in three days speaking of His body and not of their temple of old. It was split from top to bottom and the earth quaked so much that the bedrock shifted and the ground shook. And they still think God has pleasure in a modern rendition made with man’s hands and man’s devising when He said “when you make me a temple, if you use hewn stone you have defiled it” showing today’s buildings in the godless, satanic rendition of old is made by free Mason’s whose symbol is the pyramid, of which their illumined logos are found imbedded in the modern Jews government buildings, designed and paid for by the Zionist Rothschild, owners and financier, whom he purchased from England’s Lord Belfour for tricking the U.S. involvement in WW2. For “we know those who say they are Jews but of the synogog of Satan” who pursue the modern day rendition “with all lying signs and wonders if possible to deceive the elect”? We were warned! (2 These 2)

Initially all the Jews that were left after the dispersion of the other 11 tribes at the time of Christ were from Satan, except the unsuspecting and those at the Jordan river being baptised. John said to the onlookers “brood of vipers. Who warned you of the coming wrath”, thereby concluding the Jews in the time of Christ. Even as James addressed the 12 tribes, and Peter the pilgrims, showing that it was those of the dispersia who headed the warning to abandon that Jerusalem before it was churned to dirt.

Just as Father Jacob/Israel said to Jew/Judah about their demise. That they would pass on the law and the sceptor to Shiloh, the man of peace then “Unto Him would be the obedience of the people” then He told them to leave. Meaning those who stayed did not obey, because they were not His.

They should’ve recognized Him riding on a foal of a colt. But they said “He is not our King”.  They also said “on us and our children shall be your blood”. And so it was, showing us that whole culture was implicit in the death and judgment of Christ and fullfil Leviticus 26.29  And Deuteronomy 28.53

For them to think of a re-enactment anytime after just doesn’t agree with scripture.

So when Paul said, that all Israel would be saved, then Christ owes the Jews of that age of an apology and He must repent for making a mistake.

Oh contrare!  Scripture said that on them will be laid all the blood of all the prophets from Abel to that day and that happened. They were judged.

So a  rebuilding of Jerusalem with a Third Temple with the same Law culture again as somehow supposed to be God’s purpose today? They are confused.

When Christ was overlooking Jerusalem with the disciples and they were amazing over such workmanship and craftiness of the hands of man in the glorious buildings in Christ said to them not one stone shall be left upon another that shall not be thrown down. Christ was not morning over that situation as though it was not part of his plan because he is the one who was seated far above all principalities and Powers showing for us that it was his designation design and purpose to do that and to fulfill all the scriptures that all the old law in the old testament with all its buildings artifacts and feast emphatically fulfilled Eternal in the heavens for him to have finished his purpose of establishing a new kingdom with the kingdom of God is at hand in the New Covenant. God is in control, God is purposeful, and God has judged the old wine in the old wineskins have been expired.

And if that isn’t enough to understand the distain that Christ had over those idolatrous articles, Paul also wrote in Galatians in the purpose of the book and the main verses that say cut off the bondwoman and her son that her son will not be heirs. Paul also said that Jerusalem of that time was under bondage. Because “Heavenly Jerusalem is the mother of us all drawing a contrast because between the Heavenly Kingdom in the old Covenant Kingdom that only imaged Heavenly Jerusalem dimly. Even as Peter said that “some things Paul wrote are hard to understand, and that there are those who twist them to their own destruction. And that’s what the Jews in Palastine do today.

You cannot co-mingle Heavenly and earthly things.  Even as Christ spoke to Nicodemus about the rebirth. He said “that which is born of flesh is flesh and that which is born of the spirit is Spirit” showing us a distinction between the two. And what a confusing mess it is if Christ through the eternal spirit who shed his blood for the remission of sins to enact the New Covenant, for to be set aside to return to sacrificing animals again.

Even as Hebrew said that the sacrificing of animals didn’t work. And as Paul also spoke in Thessalonians, that for this reason God should send forth a delusion that they all should believe a lie for those who did not take pleasure in righteousness, well this is it. For that epic and that era was the Covenant of death. The only real purpose it would have today is to collect all those who rejected Christ today in the same way they did back then that they may all be condemned who would not take pleasure in, the kingdom of God at hand. This is the gospel.

So let’s clarify what a Jew is and what Israel is with Paul’s own words he wrote right before he wrote in Romans that “all Israel will be saved? He defines Israel stopppe

Paul earlier in Romans said that a Jew is not the outward expression but a thing of the heart. Who also clarified what a true Jew is more by saying it is not the circumsision of the flesh but of the heart.

Paul defines Israel not as a plot of land, but a people saying “they are not all Israel who are of Israel, ⁷ nor are they all children because they are the seed of Abraham; but, “In Isaac your seed shall be called.” ⁸ That is, those who are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God; 

 So why do people today believe the Israel to be saved is a piece of dirt in Palastine?

So whatever gifts or rewards that were due to the Jew of Jerusalem were paid in full. As scripture said “on you shall shall be laid all the blood of all the prophets from Abel to their day” because they would not lay it on the Christ at the cross for them to be saved, so their son was their own. These were not God’s children. Even as John 1 says that “He came to His own (those who were called Jews) and His own did not receive Him, but to ad many as received Him to them (meaning us) He gave power to become His children, even to those who believe in His name”. They did not do this.

Here is what the writer of Hebrews has to say about the Israel if old, the tribes of Jacob, “I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they did not continue in My covenant, and I disregarded them, says the Lord.

The gifts and the callings of God are irrevocable? These who were called Jews didn’t have Gods things to begin with.  Or they would not have been called such.

And of the things that they had? They were all replaced. All the law and the prophets were until John the Baptist, now the kingdom is preached and it wasn’t the one on earth. It was the kingdom of God at hand. The one that expired that old visual package. If Jesus Christ takes pleasure in the Israel of today or has part in the making of it, then he would be a transgressor. Even as Paul had said if I rebuild the things that I destroyed I make myself a transgressor, and this principle applies to the Lord himself. If he was unhappy with it then, why would He take pleasure in rebuilding it today. Wasn’t it all the blood sacrifices of all the animals that only dimly depicted to contrast of the Old Covenant of death to portray things of the New Covenant of life. The two do not commingle at all. It is just as far as the East is from the West and the old wine in the old wineskins from the new wine of the new skins, such are we.

The kingdom of God is at hand and has been since it was first spoken of. So to rebuild something here on Earth to think that it is the modern-day replacement is to despise the gift given in Christ that has been available throughout the ages of him who said I will never leave you or forsake you and wherever two or more are gathered in my name there I am in their midst. He does not need an earthly Temple. Paul said we are the temple that’s it.

There are plenty other examples that the gifts and callings of God are revocable.